Sustainable climate change adaptation (CCA) has become increasingly critical as communities worldwide face escalating climate risks. Selseng and Gjertsen’s research provides valuable insights. Their findings align with a broader body of evidence from the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report. This report emphasizes that effective local adaptation requires coordinated multilevel governance and transformative approaches (IPCC, 2022). This article synthesizes current research on local CCA implementation, focusing on governance structures, municipal challenges, and transformative processes.
Multilevel Governance: A Pivotal Role
Recent studies have demonstrated that regional support significantly enhances local adaptation outcomes. The European Environment Agency’s assessment of adaptation in European cities (EEA, 2020) found something important. Municipalities with strong regional partnerships were three times more to adopt such strategies. They had a significantly higher likelihood of implementing comprehensive adaptation strategies. This aligns with research from the United Nations Development Programme. The research shows that intermediary organizations play crucial roles. They translate national policies into local action (UNDP, 2021).
Key success factors include:
- Vertical integration of policies across governance levels
- Regular knowledge exchange between regional and local authorities
- Standardized risk assessment frameworks adapted to local contexts
.@ICLEI recently released the @shiftcities Multilevel Governance for Integrated Urban Planning report at the UNEA-7 Cities and Regions Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. The report highlights how countries across Asia, Africa, and Latin America are transforming national climate ambition… pic.twitter.com/XpgUeYe9re
— ICLEI South Asia (@ICLEISouthAsia) December 10, 2025
Challenges in Small and Medium-Sized Municipalities
The World Bank’s “City Resilience Program” (2023) has documented that smaller municipalities face distinct challenges in implementing CCA. However, contrary to common assumptions, research published in “Global Environmental Change” suggests that resource constraints may be secondary to institutional and organizational factors. A meta-analysis of 235 local adaptation initiatives found that successful outcomes correlated more strongly with:
- Strong institutional networks (correlation coefficient 0.72)
- Technical capacity building (correlation coefficient 0.68)
- Stakeholder engagement (correlation coefficient 0.65)
The Shift Towards Transformative Adaptation
The concept of transformative adaptation has gained prominence in recent years. This is supported by evidence from the Global Commission on Adaptation (2021). Their analysis of over 300 local adaptation initiatives revealed that transformative approaches fundamentally alter systems. These approaches do not merely make incremental changes. They showed significantly higher long-term effectiveness.
Research from the Stockholm Resilience Centre identifies key elements of successful transformative adaptation:
- Integration with sustainable development goals
- Focus on systemic changes rather than isolated interventions
- Consideration of long-term climate scenarios
- Robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks
Practical Implications and Implementation
Drawing from the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group’s best practices (2023), successful local adaptation requires:
1.Enhanced Regional Coordination
- Establishment of formal coordination mechanisms
- Regular assessment of regional support effectiveness
- Development of shared resources and knowledge platforms
2.Capacity Building
- Technical training programs for municipal staff
- Peer learning networks
- Access to climate science expertise
3.Political Leadership
- Integration of adaptation into municipal planning processes
- Clear communication of climate risks and opportunities
- Long-term commitment to adaptation strategies
Conclusion
Recent research demonstrates that successful local climate adaptation depends on strong multilevel governance, institutional capacity, and transformative approaches. The evidence suggests that municipalities can achieve significant adaptation outcomes. This is true regardless of their size when supported by appropriate governance structures and institutional frameworks.
FAQs
What are the main drivers of sustainable climate change adaptation at the local level?
Sustainable local climate change adaptation is driven by factors such as political awareness and leadership, risk perception among officials and communities, stakeholder collaboration, network participation (e.g., inter-municipal or regional networks), municipality size (larger ones often have more resources), and updated climate plans. Research on Norwegian municipalities shows these enhance holistic efforts, while multilevel governance coordinating national, regional, and local actions amplifies success by addressing resource gaps in smaller areas
Why is multilevel governance important for local climate adaptation?
Multilevel governance bridges national policies with local implementation, providing funding, guidance, and technical support that municipalities often lack independently. It enables coordinated responses to shared risks (e.g., flooding across regions) and supports transformative adaptation. The IPCC AR6 stresses that effective local adaptation requires vertical integration (e.g., national frameworks enabling municipal action) and horizontal coordination (e.g., cross-sector collaboration), reducing barriers like limited capacity in smaller municipalities.
What are the biggest challenges municipalities face in climate change adaptation?
Common challenges include limited resources (financial, staff, and technical expertise), competing priorities (e.g., economic development vs. risk reduction), institutional barriers (e.g., short-term political cycles), and differing impacts by municipality size (smaller ones struggle more with planning and implementation). Additional hurdles are lack of clear responsibilities, data uncertainties, and equity issues in vulnerable communities (Selseng & Gjertsen, 2024; studies on global municipal planning).
How does community participation drive effective local climate adaptation?
Community-led and participatory approaches empower locals to identify vulnerabilities, integrate Indigenous and traditional knowledge, and co-design solutions, leading to more equitable and sustainable outcomes. This builds trust, ensures measures fit local contexts, and addresses social vulnerabilities. IPCC AR6 and globally led adaptation principles highlight that prioritizing affected communities in planning and monitoring yields better risk reduction and resilience than top-down methods.
What role does equity play in sustainable local climate change adaptation?
Equity ensures adaptation benefits marginalized and low-income groups most at risk, prioritizing fair burden-sharing and inclusive processes to avoid maladaptation (e.g., measures that displace vulnerable populations). Transformative adaptation succeeds when it reduces inequalities, integrates social justice, and shares risks equitably. IPCC AR6 notes greatest well-being gains come from focusing on these communities, aligning with drivers like inclusive governance for long-term sustainability.
References
Aall, C., Meyer-Habighorst, C., Gram-Hanssen, I., Korsbrekke, M.H. & Hovelsrud, G., 2023. ‘I’m fixing a hole where the rain gets in, and stops my mind from wandering’: Approaching sustainable climate change adaptations. Weather, Climate, and Society, 15(2), pp.349–364. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-22-0113.1.
Aguiar, F.C., Bentz, J., Silva, J.M.N., Fonseca, A.L., Swart, R., Santos, F.D. & Penha-Lopes, G., 2018. Adaptation to climate change at local level in Europe: An overview. Environmental Science and Policy, 86, pp.38–63. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.010.
Amundsen, H., Berglund, F. & Westskog, H., 2010. Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation—a question of multilevel governance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, pp.276–289. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1068/c0941.
Dilling, L., Lackstrom, K., Haywood, B. & Dow, K., 2017. The dynamics of vulnerability: why adapting to climate variability will not always prepare us for climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(4), pp.445–457. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.341.
Magnan, A.K., Schipper, E.L.F., Burkett, M., Bharwani, S., Burton, I., Eriksen, S. & Ziervogel, G., 2020. Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11(1), e599. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.599.
Patterson, J., 2021. Supporting transformative adaptation in local communities: the role of networked governance. Regional Environmental Change, 21(1), pp.56–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01712-y.
Reckien, D., Buzasi, A., Magnan, A.K., Schipper, E.L.F., Viner, D., Zevenbergen, C. & Ziervogel, G., 2023. Enhancing the quality of urban adaptation: Learning from planning and implementation. Cities, 139, p.104224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104224.
Selseng, T. & Gjertsen, A., 2024. What drives sustainable climate change adaptation at the local level? Approaching three knowledge gaps. Sustainable Development, [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3043.
Shi, L. & Moser, S.C., 2021. Transformative adaptation to climate change: What it is, why it matters, and what is needed. One Earth, 4(6), pp.810–823. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.011.
Singh, C., Rahman, H., Bazaz, A., Singh, R. & Alam, A., 2022. Normative framings of climate adaptation and their implications for just and sustainable outcomes. Global Environmental Change, 73, p.102479. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102479.
